From eea25558c766d5f3a32879d16e579d051906cbf3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dan McGee Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 08:48:01 -0600 Subject: Don't cache package properties as aggressively For package signatures, it turns out it is way cheaper to just parse the signature again rather than going though all the decorator and cache_function_key business. This speeds up the mismatched signatures report significantly once this is removed. For base_package, given that we only call it once from our package details template, it makes little sense to cache the result. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee --- templates/packages/details.html | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'templates') diff --git a/templates/packages/details.html b/templates/packages/details.html index aa073551..0a47217c 100644 --- a/templates/packages/details.html +++ b/templates/packages/details.html @@ -103,12 +103,12 @@ {% else %} Base Package: - {% if pkg.base_package %} - {% pkg_details_link pkg.base_package %} + {% with pkg.base_package as base %}{% if base %} + {% pkg_details_link base %} {% else %} {{ pkg.pkgbase }} - {% endif %} + {% endif %}{% endwith %} {% endifequal %} -- cgit v1.2.3-55-g3dc8