From eea25558c766d5f3a32879d16e579d051906cbf3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dan McGee Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 08:48:01 -0600 Subject: Don't cache package properties as aggressively For package signatures, it turns out it is way cheaper to just parse the signature again rather than going though all the decorator and cache_function_key business. This speeds up the mismatched signatures report significantly once this is removed. For base_package, given that we only call it once from our package details template, it makes little sense to cache the result. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee --- main/models.py | 3 --- templates/packages/details.html | 6 +++--- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/main/models.py b/main/models.py index cc81637c..603d7ccc 100644 --- a/main/models.py +++ b/main/models.py @@ -141,7 +141,6 @@ class Package(models.Model): return '%s://%s%s' % (proto, domain, self.get_absolute_url()) @property - @cache_function(15) def signature(self): try: data = b64decode(self.pgp_signature) @@ -154,7 +153,6 @@ class Package(models.Model): return packets[0] @property - @cache_function(15) def signer(self): sig = self.signature if sig and sig.key_id: @@ -318,7 +316,6 @@ class Package(models.Model): new_pkgs.append(package) return new_pkgs - @cache_function(125) def base_package(self): """ Locate the base package for this package. It may be this very package, diff --git a/templates/packages/details.html b/templates/packages/details.html index aa073551..0a47217c 100644 --- a/templates/packages/details.html +++ b/templates/packages/details.html @@ -103,12 +103,12 @@ {% else %} Base Package: - {% if pkg.base_package %} - {% pkg_details_link pkg.base_package %} + {% with pkg.base_package as base %}{% if base %} + {% pkg_details_link base %} {% else %} {{ pkg.pkgbase }} - {% endif %} + {% endif %}{% endwith %} {% endifequal %} -- cgit v1.2.3-55-g3dc8